Feb 19 2011

Once Upon a Cotton Ball, Part 1

He said …

It was Thursday, November 6th, 2008. The season was autumn. The weather was cold. Thursday night, ritualistically, was the night on which my friends and I gathered to watch The Office … you know, back when The Office was actually a show worth watching? On this particular Thursday, however, Dave, Gabe, and myself were feeling especially antsy—we wanted to do something, but it was too cold for outdoor antics.

“What if we throw a party? Griffin, can we throw a party here tonight?” Dave suggested. We were pretty used to inviting ourselves over to Griffin’s apartment.

“Uh, I guess. Halloween was, like, last week.” Griffin … he always was the voice of reason.

I quickly chimed in, “Just get on Wikipedia. It has that What Happened Today in History thing. See if today is a holiday somewhere.”

As luck would have it, the day was Pyhäinpäivä, the equivalent of All Saints Day in Finland. Or something like that. At any rate, we had an excuse for a party. We sent out a quick message to our friends informing them of the impending festivities that night. Luckily, since we were already planning on watching The Office together, everyone was available. It was already late afternoon, so with the few hours we had until the party commenced, we decided to abuse Wikipedia some more and make up bogus traditions.

As our friends started piling into the all-too-small apartment (there were over twenty people crammed into a living room that was smaller than an average dorm room), the Party Planning Committee had a quick Party Planning Council. We determined that, in order to get everyone into the spirit, one of us would have to do the first tradition. Naturally, I was game.

 

She said …

“I don’t know about this …” I said nervously to my friend Emilie as we hurried off campus to the apartments across the street. I pulled my jacket closer around me to shield the November wind and tried to feel more excited about the Halloween party I was about to attend. “I’m not going to know anyone there.”

“You’ll know me!” Emilie encouraged. “Come on, you’ll like them—I promise.” She linked her arm through mine as we crossed the parking lot of the overpriced gas station next to the apartments we were heading toward.

I wasn’t so sure. I had only been at Cedarville University a couple of months, and so far the closest friends I had were the seven girls I lived with, (of which Emilie was one) and the guys that I played soccer with in the field across the street from my dorm. But it was getting to be too cold for pick-up soccer, and even though I suddenly found myself feeling uncharacteristically shy about the party we were about to walk in on, I desperately wanted to find a group of friends to call my own. Emilie had wanted me to be meet her friends for as long as I had known her, and the Halloween party they were throwing seemed like the perfect opportunity. So, resolving myself to be intentional about making friends with these people, I took a deep breath and we opened the door and stepped inside.

The room was full of people who obviously all knew each other and were having a good time. A few were in costumes, but most were just in casual clothes. They were piled on couches and bean bag chairs, and were laughing and joking as they passed around bowls of chips and plates of cookies. I slid nervously down the wall to sit on the floor next to Emilie. A couple people in the room looked familiar, but most of them were new faces. Suddenly, the music playing in the background quieted.

“Attention, ladies and gentlemen!” A tall guy with shaggy brown hair stood up. He was obviously in costume, dressed in a long black leather jacket and black pants, but I had no idea what he was supposed to be. The room quieted and the tall guy, who introduced himself as Dave, began to speak.

“Welcome to Pyhäinpäivä! The party where we celebrate the little-known Finnish All Saints Day, which just so happens to be today, because we’re tired of Halloween. So get ready for crazy a night of games to reenact the traditions of those Fins!”

I glanced quickly around the room, expecting everyone else to look as confused as I felt. To my dismay, everyone else seemed to be totally tracking with Dave, and I was clearly the only one wondering what sort of party I had just walked into.

I shot a look at Emilie. “I thought you said this was a Halloween party?!” I whispered. She just shrugged and smiled, looking slightly sheepish. She opened her mouth to respond, but Dave had begun speaking again.

“For our first tradition, we need the oldest male present to step forward, who we have determined to be my roommate, Alex Laird.” A guy who had been standing to the side of Dave, a guy I had never met, stepped forward.

“And here he is!” Dave turned and began rustling through a plastic bag, as the other guy, Alex, stood grinning nervously. From my spot in the back of the room against the wall, I studied Alex for a moment. Unlike Dave, Alex was dressed in jeans and a t-shirt and had his hands in his pockets. His light brown hair fell a little above deep, brown eyes, and his big, nervous smile made me smile in spite of myself. I couldn’t help but think he was cute.

“Alright, Mr. Laird.” Dave’s voice jerked me from my thoughts. “Long, long ago, in the Finnish blight of 1728, the Fins had to ingest their bedding and pillows to survive. To commemorate this sad time in history, you must eat one cotton ball.” Silence fell over the room as everyone tried to determine if Dave was serious or not.

I turned to Emilie in alarm. “He’s not really going to eat that, is he?” She shrugged and laughed. I tried to think back to high school biology and wondered whether or not a cotton ball could be digested. Cute or not, this guy was crazy to try and eat it. If he didn’t choke, he’d have a heck of a stomach ache tonight.

 

He said …

I stood next to Dave, confidently awaiting my cotton-ball-sealed fate. Dave fished around in the large bag of cotton balls, trying to find “just the right one,” which I later learned meant “the biggest one in the bag.” Finally, he whipped out a cotton ball and held it in front of my face—everyone in the room gasped and then laughed. I took the cotton ball, studied it intently, and then popped it into my mouth like an oversized gumball. It did not taste like a gumball. It did not chew like a gumball, and thus I could not get it down to a manageable size like a gumball.

I salivated as much as possible, trying to soak the cotton ball enough to where I could at least be confident in swallowing it. Unfortunately, it was a very large ball of cotton, and it was not soaking well at all. I grabbed the counter, trying to stabilize myself, and I gave my best effort at swallowing. For a second, I felt confident with this decision. Right up until the cotton ball was half way down my throat, where it effectively lodged itself and refused to budge.

I darted a big-eyed look at Dave. Everyone in the room was quiet, waiting for me to show some sign of victory (or maybe it was death). Frantically, I looked around for any form of liquid. I grabbed the nearest cup, threw my head back, and downed its entire contents: Mountain Dew. Much to my relief, this was finally enough for the cotton ball to slide down into my stomach. I could breath again!

 

She said …

Alex finished the last bit of Mountain Dew and raised his arms triumphantly, to the relief of the rest of the party as a shout of joy went out in the room. I folded my arms across my chest in disgust and amazement. What a weirdo. At least I could just sit in the back of the room and not be a part of all of this. I was suddenly feeling less motivated to make friends with these people.

“And now, for our next tradition!” The guy sitting next to me, dressed head-to-toe as Spiderman, handed me a carton of eggs and through his mask, instructed me to take one.

“What? I-I …” I turned to Emilie jabbing me in the side.

“Just take one!” Her eyes were excited and mischievous. Reluctantly, I reached in the carton and pulled out an egg, regretting ever agreeing to come to this ridiculous party.

An hour later, I was completely convinced I was sitting in a room full of crazy people. I had played some strange rendition of Never Have I Ever using spinning eggs and lost miserably. With every eye in the room on me, I had been forced to describe to a guy dressed in a karate outfit, who I had never met, what I would give him for Christmas, all while holding a stick of butter. In honor of some Finnish king, we all stood up and sang the theme song of The Fresh Prince Bel-Air, a song that I didn’t know, which meant I just awkwardly mouthed the words. It had been the most ridiculous night I had experienced so far at Cedarville. If nothing else, at least I could rule these insane people out of my options for a group of friends. Just when I thought the party had to be over, Dave stood up again.

“Our final tradition! The conga line!” Before I could protest or even comprehend what was happening, I found myself being dragged into a wild, dancing line. After circling the apartment a couple times, we burst out the front door and began winding through the parking lot, and finally into the door of the neighboring gas station. I ducked my head in dismay and hoped no one there recognized me. We were definitely attracting a lot of attention. I was relieved when the party finally ended.

“Wasn’t that crazy?” Emilie asked excitedly as we headed back to our dorm a little while later. I rolled my eyes.

“Crazy? That guy who ate the cotton ball is lucky he didn’t choke. I can’t believe he’d do that on a dare.” I answered smugly.

“I meant the party.” Emilie said, amused.

“Oh, that. Yeah, it was pretty crazy. Your friends are kind of … well, strange.”

“Yeah, I know.” Emilie said matter-of-factly, “But you’ll grow to love them.”

I laughed to myself at Emilie’s last statement. I had no plans of growing to love a bunch of crazies who parade around gas stations in celebration of obscure Finnish holidays. In fact, I was pretty sure I would be just fine going about the rest of college without hanging around a bunch of cotton ball-eating weirdos.

 

He said …

For the record, Jess was right—I did have a horrible stomachache the next day. If you care read of my suffering, or if you just want to know more about the party at which Jess and I first met, click here to read the blog I posted the day after the very first Pyhäinpäivä.

Permanent link to this article: http://alexlaird.net/2011/02/once-upon-a-cotton-ball-part-1/

Feb 14 2011

Once Upon a Cotton Ball, Preface

We Said …

Happy Valentine’s Day! In honor of the Day of Love, we (Alex and Jess) have decided to totally rip off Jenna and Joey’s idea from a few years back and write out our gushy love story for the entire world to see. It’s a lengthy story that dates back to way before we were dating, so we figure most of you haven’t actually heard the entire thing. We’ve decided to post one entry each Saturday leading up to our wedding, May 14th, 2011. Consequently, our story will be in 14 parts—the final installment appearing on the morning of our wedding, three months from today.

“But Alex and Jess,” you may say, “there are only thirteen weeks until you’re wedding! Your math is off!” Don’t you think we realize that? Don’t you think we have lists and chains informing us as to exactly how many days and weeks are left until our wedding? Well … Jess does. Alex doesn’t, actually. He just keeps track in his head. But anyway. The thirteenth part will actually be posted on Friday the thirteenth, the day before our wedding.

Two names in the following story have been changed: Sid and Ted (in order of appearance). Their characters would have been omitted if they had not played such a significant roll in the development of our relationship—really, we owe to them that we’re even got together in the first place. All that to say, we never mean to paint either of them in a negative light—they are both actually nice people—we only mean to show how their involvement contributed to our story.

That’s all the information you’re getting for now. Naturally, we assume you’ll be looking forward to the first installment this Saturday. Until then, Happy Valentine’s Day!

Happy Valentines Day!

Permanent link to this article: http://alexlaird.net/2011/02/once-upon-a-cotton-ball-preface/

Feb 07 2011

Get Organized 1.0

www.getorganizedapp.com

Look, I know you’re all tired of me going on and on about Get Organized, but I promise this one is actually significant enough to warrant a blog post.

I am please to announce that I have finally rolled out the first out-of-beta release of Get Organized: v1.0. This is especially exciting because, not only does v1.0 support every feature that I had in my original plans for Get Organized (before I even started development), but I’ve also managed to eliminate every item from the Known Issues list. Basically what this means is that you can confidently download Get Organized and know that all issues I and/or The Users have found have been fixed.

That being said, in v1.0 I’ve also tried to fix a lot of the “annoyances” that I’ve seen commented on in emails and reviews. I’ve added the ability for user to specify details about themselves and their advisor, and now you can specify multiple Instructors for one Course. I’ve polished up parts of the interface so they look a little more clean, and I’ve tried to make other parts of the interface a little more intuitive. For instance, if you want to edit a Term or a Course, you now go to … the Terms and Courses window instead of the Settings window!

Yah, crazy, I know. You can also now give a course/lab a number and a website.

User Details can be added in the Settings window. Specify Student and Advisor details. Need to contact your advisor at any time? Just click the new “Contact Advisor” button that is shown in the right panel when no Terms or Courses are selected. And speaking of contacting important people, the Ask Instructor button is much better now as well. Before, it was only enabled for an Instructors email address, but you now have the ability to contact any of your Instructors via email or phone–a little menu will pop down with all available ways to contact your Instructors when you click the Ask button.

That’s about all I’ve got for you for now. Try out Get Organized and let me know what you think!

www.getorganizedapp.com

Permanent link to this article: http://alexlaird.net/2011/02/get-organized-1-0/

Feb 07 2011

Java: OS X Dock Icon and Name

For as long as I’ve been developing in Java, its lack of native support for OS X has always bothered me. This is more than likely an issue with Apple’s proprietary interface rather than Java, but, for the sake of being loyal to my Master, we’ll pretend the fault is on Java.

I don’t want the default Java icon–I want my applications icon to appear in the dock! And why does setTitle not actually change the name of my program in the menu bar? It still remains the name of the Java package that the main () method is contained within. I don’t want people to know the package layout of my software.

Of course, Apple’s “solution” to this is contained within Xcode … Just make an .app wrapper for your application! Native dock icon, native dock name. But then that’s just the problem–the application now appears to be native and is no longer portable. There has to a better solution …

Well, there isn’t. There’s no real solution to this problem, but I can offer you a slight hack that works for the dock icon and name, at least. Unfortunately, it only works for the dock icon, and the actual application icon in Finder will still remain the Java default.

First, we’ll look at the snippet of code that allows you to change the dock icon …

com.apple.eawt.Application macApp = com.apple.eawt.Application.getApplication();
macApp.setDockIconImage (new ImageIcon (getClass ().
                                          getResource ("/jtksol/go/images/go.png")).
                                        getImage ());
									

You’ll find that there are actually quite a few cool things you can do to the dock from inside the Application class. Unfortunately, none of them are changing the dock name of your Java application. You’ll also notice that, while your program now compiles and runs beautifully on OS X, it is broken everywhere else … Apparently com.apple.eawt is a missing package on anything but OS X. What happened to portability?

Never fear. Apple has been kind enough to give us stubs that can still be called (and ignored) from platforms other than OS X. You’ll need to include the stubs JAR in your project for your application to be able to compile and run on other platforms again.

Download AppleJavaExtensions

Okay, so what about the OS X dock name then? Sadly, there’s no good solution to that. Here’s the best work-around that I’ve found–put your main () in a class by itself in your applications default package. I know, the default package is evil … That’s why the first and only thing you’ll do is call JFrame.setVisible () from within this function.

This does mean that, as far as the menu bar is concerned, your application title cannot have any spaces. It will be the exact name of the class your main function is in, so, for instance, Get Organized shows up as GetOrganized. My GetOrganized class immediately launches MainFrame from deeper within the package system, but the average user no longer has to see the package layout.

A lousy work-around? Definitely. But it’s all they’re giving us. And considering Apple seems to hate Java as of late, I doubt they’ll ever give us anything more.

 

Permanent link to this article: http://alexlaird.net/2011/02/java-os-x-dock-icon-and-name/

Jan 03 2011

Get Organized 0.183 (Beta)

www.getorganizedapp.com

Today, I rolled out a full-featured version of Get Organized. Most significantly, this latest version, 0.18 (Beta), includes the Grade Book, a quick and easy way to view your grades for each individual course throughout a term.

Your overall course grade is shown, a summary of grades within each course is shown, overall term grade is shown, and a graph of your progress in each course throughout the semester is shown.

The response I received most last semester was, “I would use your program if it were the beginning of the semester, but I’ve already put all my assignments into this other planner by hand.” That was my fault, since I initially released Get Organized two weeks into the semester. Now, there’s no excuse, and I’m hoping you’ll find Get Organized to be a much easier, more intuitive alternative to a hand-written planner.

Get Organized doesn’t just allow you to keep track of assignments. You can put appointments from your social life on it as well. It tracks your grades. At the beginning of the semester, give it as much information about a course as you can–for instance, the instructor’s name, email address, and office phone–and Get Organized will allow you to utilize that information throughout the semester. Have a question about an assignment? Select it and click “Ask Instructor” to automatically create an email. Forgot which room your class is in? Get Organized can remember that for you.

Please keep in mind that Get Organized is still in beta. The majority of what I’m testing now is the appeal of the look-and-feel … Or lack thereof. Most features that I want to be in the final release have already been implemented, and right now I’m trying to let audiences test it and get response as to how I could make Get Organized look better. Layouts, colors, etc. If you have any feedback of any kind about Get Organized, please contact us.

If you’re not interested in feedback and you just want to stay ahead this semester, that’s fine too. Try out Get Organized and see what you think!

www.getorganizedapp.com

Permanent link to this article: http://alexlaird.net/2011/01/get-organized-0-183-beta/

Nov 21 2010

To Give in a Blessed Nation

Welcome to America, home of the largest and most technologically advanced economy in the world. The United States Government spends over $40 billion on education, over $70 billion on transportation, over $70 billion on health and human services, and well over $650 billion on the Department of Defense. Annually. And these are just a few of the key expenses in the federal government’s $3.55 trillion budget.

Welcome to America, where you are granted more free rights than any other nation offers. Welcome to America, where you have the right to spit on those rights … The choice is yours (you can thank the 1960s for that). Welcome to America, where troops fight and die every day to help you keep those rights. The country where you have the right to vote … Or not. And, quite frankly, I wish a lot of you would vote with your feet. America, where your right is made even more comfortable with the wealth you sit on.

At Cedarville, I hear a lot of students bashing America. From the Christian community, I consistently hear an incessant amount of judgement towards … Everything. A target I see time and time again, in the Christian community and especially at Cedarville, is rich Americans. They live in the spotlight, so they’re hard to miss. And we love to look at them, our noses high, and judge their flamboyant lifestyles. Somehow, we then feel good about ourselves when we compare their style of living to our lowly, humble means. Are we really that ignorant? If you honestly would like to live lowly and humbly, it is impossible to do it while living in this country.

If you make more than $25,000 a year, your income is higher than 90% of the rest of the world. For perspective, that’s still making more than a full-time minimum wage in any state. If you make more than $50,000 in a year, you’re wealthier than 99% of the world. The average American household income is just over $44,000. Sure, if we leave our blinders on and only look at America, you could call us poor college students the poor ones. But according to the world’s standards, we’re filthy rich. We are, without a doubt, a blessed nation. And we have no place to judge anyone but ourselves.

I was born into a wealthy family that gave generously, an example my parents set for which I am extremely grateful. I knew how to budget before I knew how to walk, and I understood the necessity of giving to the Church before I could move the mouse on a computer. And, yet, I still missed it.

I started making money at a younger age than any of my friends, or anyone I know, really, and my parents taught me how to manage it well. They taught me that you tithe first and foremost, then divide the rest of your expenses up into little envelopes. When the money in an envelope was gone, the spending for that category was done until the next paycheck. I could understand this. It made sense to me. It seemed smart.

Except that tithing thing. What was I getting from that, I thought? I had heard Dad and Grandpa talk about investments: you put my in, months or years later you take it out and, voila, you earned money! But the Bank of Jesus didn’t seem like it was earning much for my investment. And it’s hard to give when you don’t have a heart for it. But I thought it was required, so I (usually) gave anyway, begrudgingly.

Fast forward to college. I sat through Old Testament with Dr. Miller and came upon a startling revelation. Tithing in Biblical times coincided with taxation. In fact, tithing was taxation. My little mind sped through the ramifications of this, and suddenly I realized … I already paid taxes. Could this mean I was free from the burden of tithing? Wait. It gets better.

Dr. Miller went on to explain that tithing is actually only referenced as a command in the Old Testament. It was part of the old covenant and, as such, we were not obligated to do it anymore. Upon further research, I confirmed my suspicion. Tithing is not mandated anywhere in the New Testament.

Surprisingly, however, I haven’t come to the conclusion that we no longer have to give money to the Church. In fact, rather just the opposite, especially as Americans. I am relieved to find that I am not commanded to give money to the Church, as I grew up thinking I was. I’m relieved of this, because it allows me to do it of my own free will. Christ doesn’t call us to be robots that do as we’re told with no heart-felt conviction. Rather, Jesus is all about the heart.

Though the New Testament does not reiterate that we must tithe, it is filled with examples of giving away our excess, supporting those in need, and not living over-abundantly. Jesus commands the “rich” of this world to take care of the less fortunate. If you are an American reading this, you are the rich in this world. If you are a student at Cedarville, you are the exceedingly rich in this world. Stop comparing yourself to the wealthiest Americans. Compare yourselves to the people Jesus hung out with. And rather than ragging on the wealthy, think about this: without those who give and give abundantly, missions wouldn’t exist.

We are all part of the Body of Christ. We each have our part. Don’t worry about what the rest of the body is doing. Make sure you’re doing your part. If you see a heart breaking video showing you statistics about world hunger or the need for clean water in Africa, stop feeling bad about it … Do something about it. Feelings are a means to an end, and without that end, the feelings are worthless.

I would like to say that I still believe firmly in tithing. But, like I’ve learned about so much here at Cedarville, it’s not a mandate, it’s a heart’s conviction. As the rich in this world, we need to have the heart to give. That’s what my parents have, and that’s what I’m grateful they’ve illustrated to me growing up. We need to give to our local Church and to the hungry and to Blood:Water Mission so remote villages can have water. Not because we’re commanded to, but because we want to. We have the resources. We are blessed to be one of the wealthiest countries in the world and certainly the most influential. We can make a difference, but the difference doesn’t come from us looking at the millionaires thinking, “Man, I wish they’d give.” The difference comes from us giving whole-heartedly and abundantly.

Permanent link to this article: http://alexlaird.net/2010/11/to-give-in-a-blessed-nation/

Nov 13 2010

I Spoke too Soon … Again

Well, I’ve done it again. Speaking too soon.

I fell asleep on the couch last night, and when I awoke to my annoying alarm this morning, I flipped over to email on my phone. My University Post Office wanted to inform me that I had a parcel!

So, I dragged myself off the couch, put a shirt on, (answered the door and talked to some Jehovah’s Witnesses that were making early-morning rounds), and headed to campus.

Guess what my parcel was? The DVDs Apple “didn’t and wouldn’t” send me! So, thanks, Apple! Despite your annoying policies, one of your own Customer Service representatives managed to sneak one past you and get me what I wanted. What a great company!

Permanent link to this article: http://alexlaird.net/2010/11/i-spoke-too-soon-again/

Nov 12 2010

Information You Won’t Find Useful, Vol. 2

Let Me Do What I Want with My MacMini

I ordered a MacMini Server at the beginning of the month. Rather than buying the client-side hardware, I purchased the server because it had a faster processor and bigger hard drive at a smaller cost. So why not? Unfortunately, it came with OS X Snow Leopard Server. I didn’t want Server. I wanted Client.

So I called support. I explained my predicament to them, and the Customer Service representative promptly said he put the OS X Client DVDs in the mail for me. Free shipping! So helpful!

Two weeks later, still no DVDs in the mail. So I called support again. I told them my case number, and I explained to them that the DVDs never arrived. There was a lot of paper shuffling, and the representative said, “Um, may I put you on hold for a minute?” A few minutes later, he came back on and said, “I’m transferring you to Enterprise Business Support.” And the conversation went something like this:

“Hello, Alex? What exactly are you trying to do with your MacMini Server?”

“I want to put your Client OS on it. But I never got a tracking number for the DVDs, and the shipment hasn’t arrived.”

“Well, according to the case number, the DVDs were shipped on the 8th and arrived on the 3rd.”

“Uh …”

“But that doesn’t matter, because you can’t install Client on the MacMini Server’s hardware.”

“Well, I don’t really want to discuss what I can and can’t do. I just want to know when the DVDs will be here.”

“Our support representative was not authorized to send you those DVDs, so they will never arrive, and we will not resend them to you. Anyway, the client operating system won’t work on the server–the drivers are different.”

“Well … I don’t really know how to say this, but you can put the client operating system on the server’s hardware. Because I’ve already done it. I’m currently running OS X 10.6.4 Client alongside Windows 7 on my MacMini Server. The drivers aren’t different, because the only hardware differences between the Client and Server editions are that you gave the server a better processor and swapped the optical drive for a second hard drive … Those aren’t really driver issues. But I’m not here to dispute you. I just want the DVDs for future backup purposes.”

“Okay, sir, well, the configuration you’re running is not a supported configuration, so we can no longer provide you with support.”

“But I’m running your operating system … on your hardware.”

“Right, but that client operating system is not supported on the server hardware.”

“It’s the SAME hardware!”

“If you call in the future, we will not be able to provide you with support unless you have the server operating system installed in the MacMini Server.”

As you may be able to guess, I don’t appreciate it when people tell me what I can and can’t put on my own computer that I purchased. I formatted Windows 7 off my Asus EEE, but you don’t see Asus banging down my door in fury. It’s still your hardware. Unless I’m running some over-clocking-tailored operating system that could damage it, you should support it.

However, if anyone else ran into the same situation I did and would like Client on your MacMini Server, don’t worry … The MacMini Server can totally run Client. You’ll need the MacMini 2010 Client DVDs. So you should make a friend who owns a MacMini 2010 non-server edition. Or, hypothetically, you could just use Google to search for the torrents. Hypothetically, you could search for “MacMini 2010 Client torrent” (you only really need the System DVD, but you can download the Applications torrent if you really enjoy slow download speeds). If you want Boot Camp, you’ll also need to search for “MacMini 2010 Boot Camp torrent.” Not that I did that.

Veteran’s Day

I’m always impressed by the amount of whining I hear from Christians. Of course, it’s always conveniently covered by a hypothetical situation, or in the form of a “healthy” debate, or “I’m just sayin’.” Like somehow that excuses it. But casual bickering aside, it gets progressively louder as Veteran’s Day approaches.

What’s the deal with Veteran’s Day, guys? Is it just another excuse for the campus to bicker about politics? Somehow, Veteran’s Day becomes Let’s Argue About Politics Day. The day has nothing to do with politics. It has nothing to do with government control or your approval of war. It has nothing to do with taxes or right-wing, left-wing debates. It has nothing to do with religion. Veteran’s Day is a day to honor the men and women who have fought and died, or continue to fight to protect your freedoms. The funny thing is, if you disagree with the what our veterans have done, if you dislike our government, if you rag on our military … You’re only taking advantage of the very freedoms those individuals have secured for you. Congratulations, you’re a part of the system and practicing entitlement!

Of course, I’m not here to argue politics. I’m here to thank our veterans for the support that they endlessly show our country. I’m here to praise our veterans for sticking up for their country, for fighting for the freedoms of a great nation, even when they are continually ridiculed by their own countrymen and especially the media. To all of you in the armed forces, thank you for your devotion to this country. We need more men and women like you. Whether we admit it or not, every individual in this country is truly grateful for you … Even in bickering against what you’re doing, they’re showing their support of the freedoms you’ve given them to voice their opinion. You are the reason this is a truly great, truly blessed nation.

Usenet.nl Sucks

Recently, I was a[n] (unwilling) participant in a money-making scheme enacted by Usenet.nl. Prior to October 18th, I had never heard of Usenet. I didn’t realize a first meeting could so bitterly turn you against something or someone.

I was sitting on my couch when a PayPal email showed up in my Inbox. I opened it and was informed that my credit card had been charged $150 for my annual subscription renewal. What annual subscription, you may ask? I had no idea. It was to something called Usenet.nl.

“What the heck is Usenet?” I asked Ryan.

“It’s like a different form of torrenting, but for lame people.”

Apparently. So I scanned through my spam folder and, sure enough, I found an email (from fourteen days prior) informing me that I did, in fact, have a Usenet.nl account! I had an email giving me my login information for Usenet.nl. So I logged in. In order to even use their subscription service, you had to download their Windows software–at the time, I didn’t even have Windows installed on any of my computers.

So I called them. And I tried not to shout.

“Um, hello. I just received a charge on my credit card saying I have some subscription with you? I don’t. So … I’d like a refund. And my name taken off anything affiliated with you.”

“Unfortunately, we can’t give you a refund. You signed a billing agreement.”

“But that’s the thing. I didn’t. I don’t even know what your company is. I didn’t even know you existed until today.”

“I’m sorry, sir, but according to our records, you signed a billing agreement with us on October 4th, and in order to not be charged for the annual subscription, you needed to cancel that agreement within fourteen days.”

“Right, but I didn’t make that agreement. It may say my name and somehow have my information, but it’s not me, and I didn’t consent to it. I’m being charged for something I don’t want and don’t use and didn’t sign up for.”

“It says here that you did sign up for it.”

“Yes, I know it says that … I’m saying that’s not true.”

“Well, then either it’s lying or you’re lying. And I certainly hope you’re not lying.” (Aside: I don’t think I’ve ever been accused by a Customer Service representative before)

“I’m not lying. Look, has my account ever had any activity on it?”

“No, it does’t look like it.”

“So, you think I’m dumb enough to sign up for something that’s $150 a year, that I don’t even know what it is, and then never use it?”

“I’m sorry, sir, but if you didn’t want the service, you needed to cancel it within fourteen days of signing the agreement.”
“How can I cancel something I didn’t sign up for and didn’t know I had? Okay, let’s try this. I wasn’t even aware I had an agreement with you until ten minutes ago, so let’s start the fourteen days from then. And I’ll cancel right now with you, on the phone!”

“But the fourteen days started on October 4th.”

“Okay. Let me talk to your supervisor.”

“You can’t do that.”

“I can’t do that?”

“No, sir.”

“Is there anyone else there that I can talk to?”

“No, I’m sorry, sir.”

“So I’m being charged $150 for a service I don’t want, I didn’t sign up for, and I will never use … You won’t cancel my account, and you won’t give me any kind of refund, and I can’t talk to anyone else?”

“No, sir, I’ve very sorry.”

“You know, ‘I’m sorry’ doesn’t give me $150 back.”

I abruptly ended my conversation with her, as it wasn’t going anywhere, and called PayPal instead. They forwarded me to the fraudulent charges department, opened a case, and told me they’d get back to me within a week (it was a much shorter, much less frustrating phone call).

Eight days later, I received two emails from PayPal. The emails said that two fraudulent charges from Usenet.nl on my account had been cancelled and fully refunded and that Usenet.nl, who had charged my account without authorization, had been reported. Thanks, PayPal. I appreciate your 100% protection guarantee against fraud. Nice try though, Usenet.nl.

Dear Ohioan Drivers

The auto industry gave you bright lights for a reason. So you could see better when it was exceptionally dark out. But there’s one small bit of information regarding bright headlights that I believe you all must be missing … They’re bright!

See, when you notice an oncoming car, or when you’re following a car closer than 100 feet, you are to turn off your bright lights. It’s not just common courtesy. It’s actually state law that you turn off your high beams within 500 feat of oncoming traffic. However, with todays exceptionally bright high beams, the courteous will turn them off much sooner.

See, where I’m from (the good state of Iowa), when we see light cascading over a hill, or around a corner … Long before we even see the other car, we flick our high beams off. That way, by the time the other driver crests the hill, his eyes aren’t burnt out by our headlights. Since I’ve lived in Ohio these four years of college, I’ve noticed that Ohioan drivers wait until after the oncoming driver is within full view before they turn off their brights … If they’re even going to turn off their high beams.

Hey, driving at night is already trying enough, Ohio. Why not give other drivers a little bit of a break too?

Permanent link to this article: http://alexlaird.net/2010/11/information-you-wont-find-useful-vol-2/

Oct 14 2010

Yet Another Misguided Cedars Article

Before reading this post, please first read the poorly constructed Cedars article here.

I have read a lot of ill written and poorly researched articles in Cedars in my time at Cedarville, but this may be the worst. Four years of Cedarville, and this is what “thinking critically” has delivered? An attack on an individual simply because, from what the article articulates, he’s popular, he makes a lot of money, and his music has been played in chapel … Twice.

I could argue for the character of Bono. I could point out interviews where Bono discusses his Christian faith (and, not being God, we have no place to make validity judgements of this). I could allude to the fact that Bono has been married to his wife for twenty-eight years, a lot longer than many celebrities in the “Christian” music industry. But all of that is immaterial given this article. Though, admittedly, after reading through this article, it’s hard to determine what is material.

“I don’t listen to many bands, Christian or not.”
This is how the writer chooses to open the article. Okay, so we shouldn’t actually take much of what you have to say to heart, right?

“For all the good things about Bono, he’s still a rock start first who makes lots of money …”
And that’s … Bad? What, the rock star, or the money? Because, as far as I can tell, the Bible doesn’t actually frown upon either.

“He does wonderful things with his popularity, but we’re making a big mistake if we’re think he’s the ideal Christian.”
Who said Bono was the ideal Christian? Where did that even come from? We just like his music. Turns out no person is the ideal Christian, so why are we writing an article using that as an argument?

“But it gives me pause … because it sets a precedent for occasionally hearing secular music before a sacred time.”
What defines music as “Christian” or “secular.” The label it’s under? I can think of plenty of “Christian” bands that, if their music were to be played before chapel, would not get a single apprehensive word. Yet the lifestyles of those band members could be far less Christ-like. But the point of music, thankfully, is not for the writers behind it. It is for the music. If we praised the writer’s behind our worship music, we would be just as wrong as if we were worshiping Bono.

You are right on one point. There is a considerable difference between chapel and church. However, I don’t see an issue with a U2 song being played in church either. We’re of this flaky mindset that we stand up, clap our hands, and those things accompanied with a worship leader up front lead us into this whole “worship” thing. Like it’s some sort of a musical trance, worship is. Yet worship is simply the act of praising God. Worship is our portrayal of God through our actions. If we choose to do that through music, that’s awesome! Even if it’s through using our musical talents to play a U2 song.

You’re suggesting that playing secular U2 song before a sacred time is wrong. Therefore, is it wrong for Dave and Gabe to walk on stage every Friday and make humorous quips before our established worship? After all, the jokes they’re making aren’t expressly Christian … They may even be secular! Is it wrong, then, for someone to play something in special music by Chopin, Bach, Schubert, or Mozart? Is it wrong for us to have wealthy, successful people come speak in chapel? Do we all have to go live in the poorest of neighborhoods, giving our money away because it’s evil? No, these notions are absurd. Almost as absurd as the notion that playing a composer like U2 before or after chapel will somehow misguide critically thinking college students.

“But something is wrong if we’ll be disappointed on the new earth because Jesus isn’t really much like Bono at all.”
Yah, the first thing I’m going to do when I get to Heaven is say, “Oh my word, Jesus, where are the sunglasses? Where’s Bono’s room? I’m not here to see you, Jesus, I’m here for the rich and the famous!” The mention that we’ll even have the ability to be disappointed when we get to Heaven is just ludicrous.

I understand that this article is an opinion. But you chose to post it in Cedarville’s paper, which does, in some way, imply the approval of Cedarville, even if passive approval. For this reason, and after reading this article I wonder, do we even have a screening process? It’ll be sad if people actually think Cedarville students are dumb enough to cast any human figure, celebrity or not, Bono or otherwise, as an ideal Christian.

Permanent link to this article: http://alexlaird.net/2010/10/yet-another-misguided-cedars-article/

Oct 12 2010

Ready, Set, BIBLE!

I’m in between homework and exam study sessions at the moment. I just finished my last exam before break, and now I need to type up my Probability and Statistics homework for tomorrow. But I’ve had this nagging notion on my mind for most of the semester, and I’ve never been able to pin it down exactly.

It was emphasized today in chapel yet again. Dr. Brown and Pastor Rohm sat on stage and responded to questions from the student body. Two of the questions in particular drew my attention and furthered brought up that strange feeling I’ve had. The questions themselves are irrelevant; it was the idea behind the questions that has been bugging me. It’s the notion that we Christians tend to trivialize scripture. On a regular basis. Yet, when we do it, we come off with this sense of superiority and competence to Christians and non-Christians alike. And we rarely actually would believe or admit that we’re trivializing scripture.

A question was asked in chapel in the form of, “Given scriptures X, Y, and Z, and understanding that A, B, and C are the surrounding cultural context, what does the Bible has to say about political (or social) issue F.” The question in chapel was in regards to social justice, and when it was read, Jess and I both laughed aloud. It was just such an enormous question demanding a small answer.

I’m not saying the Bible doesn’t have answers. I’m not trying to make wild accusations about absolute truth, certainty, and all those unrelated topics which people will more than likely get hung up on when they read this post. This post doesn’t actually have anything to do with the topic of social justice. I’m merely trying to point out a trend that I’ve been noticing to be on the steady increase in Christian circles, both publicly and privately. This, of course, includes me, which is actually where I first noticed it this nagging trend.

We take the Bible, and we demand that it answer a specific question that we have tailored ourselves. We take our political or social agenda, and we shove the Bible into it. Rather than molding our agendas from the Bible itself. We try to mold the Bible to fit our own personal tastes. We’re eager for debate, because we want to prove our position to be the Biblical one. We want to flippantly point out the key passages that we looked up (and more than likely took out of context) in a manner that looks like we just thought of the passage off the top of our head. And we want the passages we point out to be “clincher” passages that will trump our opponent. It seems to me that we’re not actually interested in investing in scripture, or in furthering the understanding of God’s Word. We just want to use it to our own personal advantage. And, in a culture that is thrilled with frivolous discussion and debate, these are all very enticing actions.

But it strikes me more recently that, though we are made in His image, He did make each of us uniquely. He gave us our own loves, desires, passions, and convictions. We get bent up, so often, on trying to convince someone else that our opinion is actually a mandate in scripture, that we overlook scripture itself. And when our own arguments on the matter fail, we submit our scriptural backbone to Dr. Brown to announce for all in chapel–maybe if we can get a prominent figure to back us, our opinion will seem more Biblical! But it’s not that our opinion is not Biblical in the first place … It’s just our opinion. I think that’s what we seem to miss.

We all have strengths. We all have weaknesses. Christians are all still fallen sinners that God has redeemed. We want so badly to have answers that we end up making the Bible black and white. We say, because it’s what we feel, that the Bible condones this denomination. The Bible says this about social justice. The Bible says this about war. The Bible says this about our roles in society, or about our gender. The Bible says this about loving your neighbor and peace and love. The Bible may say all of those things. But does it say the opposite is wrong?

The beauty of the Bible is that it’s not black and white. And, really, I think we should be glad of this. Our understandings of it are what make each of us unique. I’m not saying that there aren’t things in the Bible that God and His character do not ever compromise on. But I am saying that, for all of those things, there are way more that the Bible just doesn’t spell out for us. As much as we like to find passages that fit our agenda and claim that those things are spelled out for us, I feel like they usually aren’t.

So, am I saying social justice is a good or bad thing? Not the point. Am I saying we can’t have opinions? Of course not. The point of this post is that God gave us opinions! But we can’t expect every friend, every religious person, or every Christian to have the same opinions that we have. Demanding that our own opinions are scripture is entirely what I mean when I say we trivialize scripture.

I did like the way Dr. Brown handled the question in chapel today, however. If you noticed, he didn’t actually answer the question. He made a few remarks on the character of Christ, and then he moved on. I believe that’s the response we need to have more often. A response showing that there doesn’t have to be an answer. At least, that’s the response I’m going to try to have. Not having an answer is better than manipulating scripture to answer the question the way your agenda wants. But you guys can do whatever you want. You’re entitled to your own opinion, after all.

Permanent link to this article: http://alexlaird.net/2010/10/ready-set-bible/

Page 5 of 18« First...34567...10...Last »